von Dr. med. Ron Lehnert » 02.04.2004, 23:53
Ophthalmology. 2002 Dec;109(12):2308-13; discussion 2313-4. Related Articles, Links
Lasik enhancements: a comparison of lifting to recutting the flap.
Davis EA, Hardten DR, Lindstrom M, Samuelson TW, Lindstrom RL.
Minnesota Eye Consultants, P. A., Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA.
PURPOSE: To compare the visual outcomes and incidence of complications of lifting with recutting the lamellar flap in laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) enhancement surgery. DESIGN: Retrospective case-control study. PARTICIPANTS: Two hundred twelve consecutive eyes undergoing a LASIK enhancement procedure at a single surgery location during a 5-year period. METHODS: Charts of participants were obtained and outcome measures obtained. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Uncorrected visual acuity, best-corrected visual acuity, refractive error, complications. RESULTS: Relifting of flaps was performed in 164 of 212 eyes (77.4%), and recutting of flaps was performed in 48 of 212 eyes (22.6%). There were no significant differences in early visual outcomes between the two groups. At 1 year patients had significantly better uncorrected vision if the flap was lifted rather than recut (20/24.7 vs. 20/31.3, P < 0.008). In addition, the flap lift group had a significantly more stable refraction at 1 year than did the recut group (change in spherical equivalent: +0.05 diopters (D) vs. -0.57 D). The incidence of complications did not significantly differ between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: LASIK enhancement surgery can be performed safely and effectively by either lifting or recutting a flap. Lifting the flap may show better long-term stability of refractive error and uncorrected acuity.
PMID: 12466175 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
Ophthalmology. 2002 Dec;109(12):2308-13; discussion 2313-4. Related Articles, Links
Lasik enhancements: a comparison of lifting to recutting the flap.
Davis EA, Hardten DR, Lindstrom M, Samuelson TW, Lindstrom RL.
Minnesota Eye Consultants, P. A., Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA.
PURPOSE: To compare the visual outcomes and incidence of complications of lifting with recutting the lamellar flap in laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) enhancement surgery. DESIGN: Retrospective case-control study. PARTICIPANTS: Two hundred twelve consecutive eyes undergoing a LASIK enhancement procedure at a single surgery location during a 5-year period. METHODS: Charts of participants were obtained and outcome measures obtained. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Uncorrected visual acuity, best-corrected visual acuity, refractive error, complications. RESULTS: Relifting of flaps was performed in 164 of 212 eyes (77.4%), and recutting of flaps was performed in 48 of 212 eyes (22.6%). There were no significant differences in early visual outcomes between the two groups. At 1 year patients had significantly better uncorrected vision if the flap was lifted rather than recut (20/24.7 vs. 20/31.3, P < 0.008). In addition, the flap lift group had a significantly more stable refraction at 1 year than did the recut group (change in spherical equivalent: +0.05 diopters (D) vs. -0.57 D). The incidence of complications did not significantly differ between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: LASIK enhancement surgery can be performed safely and effectively by either lifting or recutting a flap. Lifting the flap may show better long-term stability of refractive error and uncorrected acuity.
PMID: 12466175 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
